<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How was Northern Italy opposite from Southern Italy during a commencement of a Renaissance?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://travelbie.com/italy/how-was-northern-italy-different-from-southern-italy-at-the-beginning-of-the-renaissance.travel/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://travelbie.com/italy/how-was-northern-italy-different-from-southern-italy-at-the-beginning-of-the-renaissance.travel</link>
	<description>Travel the Traveller Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 22:48:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OverTheEdge</title>
		<link>http://travelbie.com/italy/how-was-northern-italy-different-from-southern-italy-at-the-beginning-of-the-renaissance.travel/comment-page-1#comment-819</link>
		<dc:creator>OverTheEdge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://travelbie.com/italy/how-was-northern-italy-different-from-southern-italy-at-the-beginning-of-the-renaissance.travel#comment-819</guid>
		<description>naz f is alittle wrong: naples is not in the north but it is maybe one of the most important cities of the south of italy: it was very powerful thanks to its important seaport.

southern italy was not similar to northern europe(neither today, I live in the south, there are still a lot of differences and the north is much more powerful and advanced than the south). 

in the north there where a lot of little states, which were under the control of some important and rich families.

the northern was much more developped than the southern, where there where the &quot;borboni&quot;(I don&#039;t know how to say it in english..they had spanish origins) and had as consequence  the exploitation of  lands and people who were submitted to em.

maybe the north was similar to the northern europe, even if it was basically different because while in the europe there were already powerful states and empires, northern italy was divided: italy didn&#039;t really exist at that very moment.
only in 1800 after the industrial revolution, the northern italy will really develop its resources, while the southern italy will still have a lot of problems in industrialization and will be still devided until 1860, after garibaldi&#039;s work.

anyway, even today there are still a lot of differences between the southern and northern italy: in the south in fact resources are still missing, politicians are corrupted and the services don&#039;t work.this situation is also a reflection of those years.

that&#039;s why I can&#039;t see the time for leave and go living in the north, where i&#039;m going to study and where there&#039;are more  opportunities of job

i hope it&#039;s clear, i know that my english is not very good.anyway I hope it could be good for you.
bye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>naz f is alittle wrong: naples is not in a north though it is may be a single of a many critical cities of a south of italy: it was unequivocally absolute interjection to a critical seaport.</p>
<p>southern italy was not identical to northern europe(neither today, we live in a south, there have been still a lot of differences as well as a north is most some-more absolute as well as modernized than a south). </p>
<p>in a north there where a lot of small states, which were underneath a carry out of a little critical as well as abounding families.</p>
<p>the northern was most some-more developped than a southern, where there where a &quot;borboni&quot;(I do not know how to contend it in english..they had spanish origins) as well as had as effect  a exploitation of  lands as well as people who were submitted to em.</p>
<p>maybe a north was identical to a northern europe, even if it was fundamentally opposite since whilst in a europe there were already absolute states as well as empires, northern italy was divided: italy didn&#8217;t unequivocally exist during which unequivocally moment.<br />
only in 1800 after a industrial revolution, a northern italy will unequivocally rise a resources, whilst a southern italy will still have a lot of problems in automation as well as will be still devided until 1860, after garibaldi&#8217;s work.</p>
<p>anyway, even currently there have been still a lot of differences in between a southern as well as northern italy: in a south in actuality resources have been still missing, politicians have been depraved as well as a services do not work.this incident is additionally a thoughtfulness of those years.</p>
<p>that&#8217;s because we can&#8217;t see a time for leave as well as go vital in a north, where i&#8217;m starting to investigate as well as where there&#8217;are some-more  opportunities of job</p>
<p>i goal it&#8217;s clear, i know which my english is not unequivocally good.anyway we goal it could be great for you.<br />
bye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naz F</title>
		<link>http://travelbie.com/italy/how-was-northern-italy-different-from-southern-italy-at-the-beginning-of-the-renaissance.travel/comment-page-1#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator>Naz F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://travelbie.com/italy/how-was-northern-italy-different-from-southern-italy-at-the-beginning-of-the-renaissance.travel#comment-820</guid>
		<description>A is the best answer, as it is today.  Northern Italy had all the largest and wealthiest cities (with the exception of Naples), managed most of Italy&#039;s international trade, and ran the banking system for Italy.  

Southern Italy was in a feudal system, only in an informal sense...Most farmers would lease their land as in a feudal system, from a wealthy landowner; but the landowner would not be a nobleman.

All the above factors (except for land ownership) are true for Italy today, except that the North is also more industrialized than the South.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A is a many appropriate answer, as it is today.  Northern Italy had all a largest as well as wealthiest cities (with a difference of Naples), managed many of Italy&#8217;s general trade, as well as ran a promissory note complement for Italy.  </p>
<p>Southern Italy was in a feudal system, usually in an spontaneous sense&#8230;Most farmers would franchise their land as in a feudal system, from a rich landowner; though a property owner would not be a nobleman.</p>
<p>All a on top of factors (except for land ownership) have been loyal for Italy today, solely which a North is additionally some-more industrialized than a South.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: travelbie.com @ 2012-05-23 22:21:59 -->
